A make or buy decision is a strategic evaluation process where a company decides whether to manufacture a product, component, or service internally or purchase it from an external supplier. This decision applies to various aspects of the supply chain, such as producing raw materials, assembling parts, or even providing services like logistics or IT support.
The goal is to choose the option that best aligns with the company’s operational capabilities, cost structure, and long-term objectives. For example, a car manufacturer might decide whether to produce engine parts in-house or source them from a specialized supplier.
Several factors influence whether a company should make or buy. These can be grouped into quantitative (cost-related) and qualitative (strategic or operational) considerations:
Make Costs: Include labor, raw materials, equipment, facility overhead, and maintenance. Producing in-house may require significant upfront investments in machinery or training.
Buy Costs: Include supplier pricing, transportation, taxes, and potential quality control expenses. Outsourcing may also involve contract management costs.
Break-Even Analysis: Companies often compare the total cost of making versus buying to determine the most economical option.
If the product or service is central to the company’s expertise or competitive advantage (e.g., proprietary technology), making it in-house may be preferred to maintain control and quality.
If it’s peripheral to the core business, outsourcing to specialists can free up resources for more critical activities.
Make: Does the company have the production capacity, skilled labor, or infrastructure to produce efficiently? Scaling up in-house production may require significant investment.
Buy: Outsourcing can provide flexibility to scale production up or down based on demand without committing to fixed costs.
Make: In-house production allows direct oversight of quality standards but requires robust processes.
Buy: Outsourcing depends on the supplier’s reliability. Companies must vet suppliers and establish quality agreements to avoid risks.
Make: Internal production reduces dependency on external suppliers but may expose the company to risks like equipment failures or labor shortages.
Buy: Outsourcing introduces risks like supplier delays, geopolitical issues, or price volatility, which require strong supplier relationships and contingency plans.
Producing in-house may take longer if new processes or facilities are needed.
Outsourcing can speed up delivery if suppliers are already equipped, but lead times depend on their efficiency.
Intellectual Property: Making in-house protects proprietary designs or processes.
Market Positioning: Producing unique components internally can differentiate a brand.
Sustainability: In-house production may allow better control over eco-friendly practices, while outsourcing requires aligning with sustainable suppliers.
Consider a smartphone manufacturer deciding whether to produce its camera modules in-house or buy them from a supplier:
Make: Building cameras internally could ensure cutting-edge quality and protect proprietary technology but requires investing in specialized equipment and expertise.
Buy: Sourcing from a trusted supplier with proven expertise in camera modules could reduce costs and speed up production, but the company risks dependency on the supplier’s performance.
After analyzing costs, capabilities, and strategic goals, the manufacturer might choose to buy the modules if the supplier offers high quality at a lower cost, freeing up resources to focus on core areas like software development.
Cost Efficiency: Choosing the most cost-effective option boosts profitability.
Focus on Core Strengths: Outsourcing non-core activities allows companies to prioritize innovation and differentiation.
Flexibility: Buying can provide agility to adapt to market changes, while making can ensure long-term control.
Risk Management: A balanced approach mitigates risks like supplier disruptions or capacity constraints.
Competitive Advantage: Aligning the decision with strategic goals strengthens market positioning.
Data Accuracy: Inaccurate cost estimates or demand forecasts can lead to poor choices.
Supplier Reliability: Outsourcing requires thorough vetting to avoid quality or delivery issues.
Long-Term Implications: Short-term cost savings from buying may conflict with long-term benefits of making, like building in-house expertise.
Change Management: Shifting from make to buy (or vice versa) can disrupt operations and require employee retraining.
Conduct a Cost-Benefit Analysis: Compare the total costs of making versus buying, including hidden costs like transportation or quality control.
Assess Capabilities: Evaluate internal resources, expertise, and capacity against supplier offerings.
Align with Strategy: Ensure the decision supports long-term goals, such as innovation or market differentiation.
Evaluate Risks: Identify potential risks (e.g., supplier dependency, production bottlenecks) and plan mitigations.
Test and Monitor: Pilot the decision on a small scale, track performance, and adjust as needed.
Make or buy decisions are pivotal in shaping an efficient and competitive supply chain. By carefully weighing costs, capabilities, risks, and strategic priorities, businesses can choose the path that optimizes resources and drives success. Whether producing in-house to maintain control or outsourcing to leverage external expertise, the right decision aligns with the company’s goals and delivers value to customers.
support@lassoprocurement.com
© 2025 Lasso Supply Chain Software LLC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
